Therefore, we recommend that: (1) in addition to the usual question, ‘Why do you want to participate in this trial?’, all potential participants should be asked the question: ‘What are you giving up by participating in this trial?’ and (2) researchers should consider the settings in which it may be possible and practical to obtain ‘two-point consent’. We further contend that assessing patient-subjects’ appreciation as a component of informed consent-it is already an established component of decision-making capacity assessments-can help elucidate the link between understanding-beliefs and motivation appreciation refers to an individual’s understanding of the personal significance of both the medical facts and the experience of trial participation. Recent discussions of the ethics of clinical research, and especially early phase cancer trials, have identified the optimistic bias, also known as unrealistic optimism, as a possible defect in the process of informed consent. Thus, in practice, it is ethically incumbent on researchers to determine which understanding and beliefs lead to the participant’s primary motivation for enrolling, not to simply assess understanding, beliefs and motivations independently. We seek here to help resolve this controversy by showing that a crucial determination of when such therapeutic beliefs are ethically problematic turns on whether they are causally linked and instrumental to the motivation to participate in the trial. Background: Researchers worry that patients in early-phase research experience unrealistic optimism about benefits and risks of participation. The high prevalence of therapeutic misestimation and unrealistic optimism in particular has stimulated debate about whether unrealistic therapeutic beliefs in early-phase clinical trials preclude adequate informed consent. We discuss implications for health communication.Unrealistic therapeutic beliefs are very common-the majority of patient-subjects (up to 94%) enrol in phase 1 trials seeking and expecting significant medical benefit, even though the likelihood of such benefit has historically proven very low. crain funeral home franklinton, la sunset village crestview, fl columbus clippers front office jobs john chisum ranch map brighthouse financial overnight address nashville, tn skip stephenson cause of death. Higher comparative optimism for infection, self-superiority, and allocentric impact perception were associated with information being sought from fewer sources higher self-superiority and egocentric impact perception were associated with lower trust. It is usually impossible to demonstrate that an individuals optimistic expectations about the future are. Individual differences in self-uniqueness were associated with differences in the number of information sources being used and trust on these sources. The Methodology of Unrealistic Optimism Research. Klein, Unrealistic Optimism: Present and Future, 15 J. Perceptions of terrorism and disease risks: A cross-national comparison. Except for participants below 25, who reported that they were affected more than average by these measures (egocentric impact bias), participants also generally reported that they were less affected than average (allocentric impact bias). is a platform for academics to share research papers. As a group, participants reported that they were less likely to get infected or infect others or to suffer severe outcomes than average (unrealistic optimism) and that they adhered better than average to behavioural precautionary measures (illusory superiority). We administered an online survey to a community sample (N = 8696) of Dutch-speaking individuals, mainly in Belgium and The Netherlands, during the first lockdown (late April-Mid June 2020). ![]() ![]() ![]() 1 Hope is described within the medical and bioethics literature as having therapeutic value because it enables people to cope with uncertainty about their future health 1, 2. One of the most accepted findings across psychology is that people are unrealistically optimistic in their judgments of comparative risk concerning future life eventsthey judge negative events as less likely to happen to themselves than to the average person. We also examined the relationship of self-uniqueness with information seeking and trust in sources of information about the disease. The phenomenon of hope, expressed as therapeutic optimism, is an essential aspect of medical care. However, optimism is not a unitary construct it also can be defined as a general disposition, or what is called dispositional optimism. We examined perceived self-other differences (self-uniqueness) in appraisals of one’s risk of an infectious disease (COVID-19), one’s adherence to behavioural precautionary measures against the disease, and the impact of these measures on one’s life. Prior research has identified unrealistic optimism as a bias that might impair informed consent among patient-subjects in early-phase oncology trials.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |